Neuromodulation: Current Practice, Limitations, and Considerations
Sunday, January 01 2012
Page 1 of 3
advertisement:
Right now, signals from your brain are instructing the
muscles around each eye to contract, panning your view
left to right and adjusting focus along the way. The photoreceptors
in your eyes react to the photons reflecting off
each letter, ultimately transmitting information through the
optic nerve, back to the primary visual cortex, where they are
translated into meaning. Although it goes mostly unnoticed,
your nervous system is constantly hard at work.
Fig. 1 – Implanted devices, such as spinal cord stimulators for intractable pain, provide constant therapy for otherwise chronic conditions. However, the invasive nature of these devices limits the cases in which they are used.
In their simplest form, every function of the human body
can be reduced to a series of electrochemical reactions in the
nervous system. Whether you are reading this page, lifting your
cup of coffee, feeling that you ate too much for breakfast, or
recognizing the song playing on the radio, all can be traced
back to the amazing, complex network of electrical connections
and chemical reactions that is the human nervous system.
The sensations we feel every day and how our body reacts to
them are the result of thousands of receptors talking to each
other. And now, scientists are getting in on the conversation.
Neuromodulation (or neurostimulation) is the application
of electrical signals to promote, inhibit, or otherwise change
neural behavior. Alan Lloyd Hodgkin and Andrew Huxley
famously showed how nerves communicate through electrical
impulses known as action potentials in 1952 (and won the
Nobel Prize for their work a decade later). When a substantial
electric potential builds up around a nerve, the nerve produces
an impulse that travels to the end of the nerve cell body,
where it connects with another cell via an electrical or chemical
synapse. The action potential from one nerve can induce a
similar potential in another nerve, allowing communication
between cells. Sometimes this connection tells a muscle to contract.
Other times, it relays sensory information back to the
brain. However, these nerves can’t distinguish between an electrical
signal from their neighbor and an electrical signal from
an implanted electrode. These artificial signals provide an
interface to communicate with the nervous system. As we learn
more and more about the way nerves communicate and the
pathways they exhibit, we can tailor our electrical impulses to
speak the body’s natural language.
Electricity has actually been applied therapeutically for centuries,
but not nearly as elegantly as implied above. In fact, the
perception most have of electrotherapy is likely electroshock
or electroconvulsive therapy, where electricity is broadly
administered to the brain to treat psychiatric disorders. The
kind of modulation detailed in this article is a very precise and
targeted application, and unlike pharmaceuticals, it works with
how the body functions naturally.
Fig. 2 – Percutaneous nerve stimulation delivers a small electrical current through a needle electrode that punctures the skin and is placed near the nerve of interest.
Traditional pharmaceuticals work by binding to molecules and
disrupting the natural responses of the body. For example,
aspirin produces an analgesic effect by inhibiting a specific
enzyme in the inflammatory pathway. Without this enzyme, the
body cannot release the molecules needed to signal pain and an
inflammatory response. Pharmaceuticals are remarkable at treating
the condition for which they are indicated. However, most of
these drugs are administered system-wide, either orally or intravenously,
and end up circulating through the bloodstream. What
happens when the molecule itself causes unwanted side effects?
Or achieving the desired effect in one location leads to an undesired
effect in another (think blood thinners and internal bleeding)?
Patients (and physicians) often assume pharmaceuticals to
be the best treatment because they are a product of years of
research at billion-dollar companies, but the list of side effects in
any pharmaceutical commercial takes up half of the ad time.
Neuromodulation offers a level of specificity and sensitivity
that pharmaceuticals can’t match. Rather than engineering a
foreign molecule aimed at disrupting the natural processes of
the body, it uses a language the body readily understands to
provide a safe and effective therapy for all users.
Neuromodulation and Neurostimulation in Practice
Just as the nervous system uses these electrical signals to control
every bodily function, scientists have tapped into these
pathways to treat a wide variety of conditions. Though neuromodulation
provides opportunities to tackle an endless number
of conditions, we will focus on stimulation using electricity.
Using the interplay between electricity and magnetism, many companies are using
the latter as a modality
for therapy. The
underlying concept
of producing an electrical
field remains the
same, but is beyond the
scope of this piece.
In cases of intractable, neuropathic
pain, spinal cord stimulators
have proven to be successful in treating
symptoms that are resistant to even the
strongest pharmaceuticals. The device
consists of a small electrical generator
positioned in the lower back and a collection
of leads that hardwire the electrode
directly to the nervous tissue in the
spine. The device delivers small electrical currents
that provide relief by blocking transmission of pain signals
from the extremities up to the brain.
Fig. 3 – Transcutaneous (or transdermal) stimulators, like the Neurowave product family, use tissue as a conductive pathway between the electrode and the nerve. Though the current is attenuated, superficial nerves can be stimulated without skin irritation.
Instead of inhibiting neural activity, functional electrical stimulation
(or FES) systems apply electricity to stimulate the motor
neurons of muscles that are impaired by lesions in the central
nervous system. These are muscles that are otherwise paralyzed
by stroke, spinal cord injury, or traumatic brain injury. Even
though the neural connection to these muscles has been disrupted,
they remain healthy for some time after injury and can
be stimulated artificially. FES has been used to allow individuals
with paraplegia to stand and even walk when given appropriate
upper body support. When the lesion is present higher in the
spinal cord, even vital organ function can be disrupted. In these
cases, FES has restored bladder and bowel control and phrenic
nerve stimulation can control respiration.
Subscribe today to receive the INSIDER, a FREE e-mail newsletter from NASA Tech Briefs featuring exclusive previews of upcoming articles, late breaking NASA and industry news, hot products and design ideas, links to online resources, and much more.